tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086009245893165129.post1210481672459116205..comments2023-08-29T21:37:25.207+08:00Comments on DE LEVIATHAN @ SG: Election Watch Part IX - Will we stay a “kintaro-ame” nation, SM Goh?C H Yakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03195578024282791294noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086009245893165129.post-8843895612899026952011-03-18T12:05:25.079+08:002011-03-18T12:05:25.079+08:00Hi Yonatan
You are correct. The "Fukushima 5...Hi Yonatan<br /><br />You are correct. The "Fukushima 50" would be considered as "kamikaze".<br /><br />I was writing too fast and in the context of PAP Ministers, 'harakiri' would never be in their vocabulary. At most, that is, if they dare to "kamikaze".<br /><br />In the Japanese context, it should be 'harakiri'.DE LEVIATHAN @ SGhttp://de-leviathan.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6086009245893165129.post-71502562828523294812011-03-17T13:48:04.447+08:002011-03-17T13:48:04.447+08:00Sir, just one correction. I believe you should use...Sir, just one correction. I believe you should use 'harakiri' instead of kamikaze in this sentence:<br />Traditionally, they would have to "kamikaze". Yonatanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11972367286144030429noreply@blogger.com